Communication Issues Will Never Die

Parallels across time

This week whilst viewing the lecture content and reading the set texts I noticed parallels between communication issues we have today and those from a couple of centuries ago (I’m talking 1800s).

Firstly, the commentary published in the New York Times in 1858 states that the telegraph is causing injury. It says, “how trivial and paltry is the telegraphic column? It snowed here, it rained there, one man killed, another hanged” (New York Times 1858). There are parallels between this and the way social media sites such as Facebook and Twitter were first received.

How trivial and paltry is the Facebook newsfeed. I woke up, I walked to the kitchen, I drank juice, it tasted nice. Apps such as Spotify jumped on the bandwagon asking you to share the song you were listening to with all of your friends (‘no, I think they will survive without that detail’). Which reminds me of good ol’ MSN, you listen to a song on iTunes and ‘Oops you did it again’. You forgot that the song would pop-up under my name. Now everyone knows that you still haven’t got over Britney.

britney spears

Secondly, I turn to the issue of communication not yet being accessible to everyone. Back in 1866, the first trans-Atlantic cable was laid and it cost $100 to send a 10-word message. These days, that comes in at around $1500. This form of communication is not for the masses, only for the elite. James Curran, an author and a professor of communications at the University of London, released a book in 2012 called ‘Misunderstanding the Internet’. He speaks about the caution we should have in thinking that the internet is a democratic source bringing the world together. He says that it is the affluent that are being brought into the conversation. The total proportion of population who were internet users in 2011 was 30 percent (Internet World Stats 2011a). This means that the people with a lower level of wealth are disconnected and are not a part of the world conversation. The internet has joined the world closer together, more than any other technology, but we still have the same communication problem in 2014 as in 1866. The internet is not yet reaching everyone.

Thirdly, as discussed by Sterling (1993) in ‘A Short History of the Internet’ – users could not be stopped from using their electronic mailboxes for content which was not work-related. In North Korea, the internet is under strict control and “North Korea has for decades commanded its citizens’ loyalty in part by telling them that they live in the richest, most advanced society on earth” (Fisher 2013). Smuggling and black markets are highly illegal in North Korea, where they’re seen as direct threats to the government’s control of information. Yet the black market is a booming economy allowed by their access to the internet. As Lessig (2006) points out – the internet is difficult to govern; and as Sterling (1993) points out – it was created this way on purpose.

There are parallels between communication issues across time that may never be solved for each respective party as long as the internet remains a free network of information flows.



Curran, J 2012, Misunderstanding The Internet, Routledge, United Kingdom.

Internet World Stats 2011a, Internet World Stats, viewed 8 August 2014, <;.

Lessig, L 2006, ‘Four puzzles from cyber space’. In L. Lessig Code version 2.0, viewed 5 August 2014, <;.

Stalder, F 2005, ‘Information Ecology’. In Open Cultures and the Nature of Networks, pp. 62-66.

Sterling, B 1993, ‘A Short History of the Internet’, The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction, Connecticut.

Image: Britney Spears 1999, Britney Spears, viewed 8 August 2014, <>.




One thought on “Communication Issues Will Never Die

  1. Hi Anna,
    I am glad you clarified the description of Facebook and Twitter as how they were ‘first received’. Something I have discussed with friends is the way in which Facebook has transformed from this banal commentary of everything from our morning Cornflakes and our feelings regarding the current weather (although the weather thing does still happen – if another civilisation were to study our culture they’d likely think this very typical – “If all other topics of conversation fail, these earthlings always turn to the weather!”), to a much more sophisticated, content-driven platform. I wonder whether our generation, being present at the birth and growth of Facebook, have adapted our use of it to our own development? Or whether some sneaky design work has been done by Mark Zuckerberg and his team to change the way in which the platform is used? Certainly, as you imply, Facebook (and associated online platforms) are now regarded much more seriously – especially in the professional workplace. But perhaps I only recognise this because I am now involved in this world? I don’t have many Facebook or Twitter contacts who are much younger than me, so I am unable to assess how their use is similar or different to my own at their age, but it would certainly be an interesting investigation to conduct.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s